PECB ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR REAL DUMPS | ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR LATEST EXAM DUMPS

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Real Dumps | ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Exam Dumps

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Real Dumps | ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Exam Dumps

Blog Article

Tags: ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Real Dumps, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Exam Dumps, Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Overviews, Valid ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Labs, Authorized ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Dumps

The greatest product or service in the world comes from the talents in the organization. Talents have given life to work and have driven companies to move forward. Paying attention to talent development has become the core strategy for today's corporate development. Perhaps you will need our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Learning Materials. No matter what your ability to improve, our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice questions can meet your needs. And with our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam questions, you will know you can be better.

In addition to the PDF questions Pass4Leader offers desktop ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice exam software and web-based ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) practice exam, to help you cope with ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) exam anxiety. These PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Practice Exams simulate the actual PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam conditions and provide you with an accurate assessment of your readiness for the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam.

>> PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Real Dumps <<

Don't Miss Golden Opportunity – Download PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Dumps Now at Affordable Rates

Taking ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice exams is also important because it helps you overcome your mistakes before the final attempt. When we talk about the ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) certification exam, the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice test holds more scoring power because it is all about how you can improve your ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Preparation. Pass4Leader offers desktop practice exam software and web-based ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice tests. These ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice exams help you know and remove mistakes.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Closing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.
Topic 2
  • Managing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.
Topic 3
  • Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.
Topic 4
  • Conducting an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
  • IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.
Topic 5
  • Fundamental principles and concepts of an AI management system: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and covers the basic principles of artificial intelligence, including ethical use, trustworthiness, and transparency. It introduces the purpose and importance of having an AI management system in place for responsible AI governance.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q67-Q72):

NEW QUESTION # 67
Auditors use the ______ as a benchmark to determine conformity.

  • A. Audit plan
  • B. Audit criteria
  • C. Audit feasibility
  • D. Audit objectives

Answer: B

Explanation:
Audit criteriaare defined as theset of policies, procedures, or requirementsused as areference pointagainst whichaudit evidence is compared.
As perISO 19011:2018 - Clause 3.5, audit criteria are the"set of policies, procedures, or requirements used as a reference". For ISO/IEC 42001 audits, the audit criteria include therequirements of ISO/IEC
42001:2023, relevant laws, internal policies, and controls.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3further confirms that conformity assessment depends on comparing actual practices and records againstpredefined criteriato identify nonconformities or compliance.
Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 3.5 (Audit criteria)
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 9.2.2
PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3: "Audit Criteria and Conformity"


NEW QUESTION # 68
Scenario 8:
Scenario 8: InnovateSoft, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a software development company known for its innovative solutions andcommitment to excellence. It specializes in custom software solutions, development, design, testing, maintenance, and consulting,covering both mobile apps and web development.
Recently, the company underwent an audit to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of its artificial intelligence management system AIMS against ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit team engaged with the auditee to discuss their findings and observations during the audit's final phases. After evaluating theevidence, the audit team presented their audit findings to InnovateSoft, highlighting the identified nonconformities.
Upon receiving the audit findings, InnovateSoft accepted the conclusions but expressed concerns about some findings inaccuratelyreflecting the efficiency of their software development processes. In response, the company provided new evidence and additionalinformation to alter the audit conclusions for a couple of minor nonconformities identified. After thorough consideration, the audit teamleader clarified that the new evidence did not significantly alter the core conclusions drawn for the nonconformities. Therefore, thecertification body issued a certification recommendation conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans without a prior visit.
InnovateSoft accepted the decision of the certification body. The top management of the company also sought suggestions from theaudit team on resolving the identified nonconformities. The audit team leader offered solutions to address the issues, fostering acollaborative effort between the auditors and InnovateSoft.During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics to enhance transparency. They clarified to InnovateSoft that the auditevidence was based on a sample, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty. The method and time frame of reporting and grading findingswere discussed to provide a structured overview of nonconformities. The certification body's process for handling nonconformities,including potential consequences, guided InnovateSoft on corrective actions. The time frame for presenting a plan for correction was communicated, emphasizing urgency. Insights into the certification body's post-audit activities were provided, ensuring ongoing support.
Lastly, the audit team briefed InnovateSoft on complaint and appeal handling.
InnovateSoft submitted the action plans for each nonconformity separately, describing only the detected issues and the correctiveactions planned to address the detected nonconformities. However, the submission slightly exceeded the specified period of 45 days setby the certification body, arriving three days later.
InnovateSoft explained this by attributing the delay to unexpected challengesencountered during the compilation of the action plans.
Question:
Was the audit team leader's attitude appropriate regarding the new evidence provided by the company?

  • A. Yes, auditors should consider the new evidence provided and modify their audit conclusion, if necessary
  • B. No, auditors should not take into consideration new evidence or additional information after reaching audit conclusions
  • C. No, auditors should consult with the certification body before making any decisions regarding new evidence presented after the stage

Answer: A

Explanation:
Auditorsmust remain open to considering additional evidence- even if submitted late - as long as it is relevant and within the audit timeframe.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.7states:"The audit team shall reconsider audit conclusions in light of any new, relevant information received before the audit report is finalized."
* TheLead Auditor Guidereinforces:"Evidence-based decision-making must include post-audit review of any additional submissions before certification decisions are made." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.7; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Manual - Section 7 ("Handling New Evidence Post-Audit").


NEW QUESTION # 69
Question:
During a combined audit, if an auditor identifies a finding linked to one criterion, should they consider its potential impact on corresponding or related criteria of other management systems?

  • A. Yes, the auditor should consider the possible impact on the corresponding or similar criteria of the other management system
  • B. No, in such cases the auditor should always focus on the specific criterion identified
  • C. Yes, the auditor should consider the other criteria only if the finding is deemed significant

Answer: A

Explanation:
In acombined audit, auditors are required toconsider the implications of a finding across different but related management systems.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.2.2states:"Findings should be evaluated not only against the specific audit criteria but also their relevance to other applicable requirements in combined audits."
* TheLead Auditor Training Manualclarifies:"In combined audits, findings must be reviewed for their potential cross-system impacts to ensure full system-wide conformity." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.2.2; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide, Combined Audit Considerations.


NEW QUESTION # 70
Scenario 5:
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by usingadvanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS basedon ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS's effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leaderdespite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team ofseven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whetherphysical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition hadbeen defined, the certification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives anddocumented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the auditactivities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks andopportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initialcontact. The initial contact aimed to confirm thecommunication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, andsummarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. During this first meeting, Robertemphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides orinterpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issuesand finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia's operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-relateddata governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. He discussed this need with Aizoia's management,proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al datagovernancepractices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the auditbased on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Robert did not receive an offer from the certification body prior to accepting the mandate. Is this acceptable?

  • A. Yes, since Robert is a full-time employee of the certification body, he may accept audit mandates without receiving a formal offer
  • B. Yes, if the auditor has extensive experience, a formal offer is not necessary
  • C. No, the audit team leader must receive an official offer before accepting the audit mandate

Answer: C

Explanation:
The audit team leadermust receive a formal appointmentbefore accepting the audit responsibility.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1requires that the audit team leader must be formally appointed by the certification body to ensure clarity and avoid conflicts.
* TheLead Auditor Guidestates:"Formal acceptance of an audit assignment is critical to ensure that audit roles, responsibilities, and impartiality expectations are clearly communicated." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Manual Section 5 ("Audit Team Leader Requirements").


NEW QUESTION # 71
Which control in Annex A emphasizes the importance of security measures in AI system operations?

  • A. Access Control
  • B. Performance Metrics
  • C. Financial Auditing
  • D. Customer Feedback

Answer: A

Explanation:
Annex A of ISO/IEC 42001:2023providesreference controlsto support operational and ethical AI governance. The control that emphasizessecurity in AI system operationsis:
A: 8.2.2 - Access Control: This control requires thatonly authorized individuals or systemscan access, modify, or influence the AI system, ensuringdata integrity and protectionof critical operations.
Access control is afoundational security controlused to prevent unauthorized interference or manipulation of AI behavior or data pipelines.


NEW QUESTION # 72
......

No matter in China or other company, PECB has great influence for both enterprise and personal. If you can go through examination with ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor latest exam study guide and obtain a certification, there may be many jobs with better salary and benefits waiting for you. Most large companies think a lot of IT professional certification. ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Exam study guide makes your test get twice the result with half the effort and little cost.

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Exam Dumps: https://www.pass4leader.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-exam.html

Report this page